Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Homer Rice vs Francis Peay
Homer Rice: 18th pct vs Francis Peay: 17th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Homer RiceFrancis Peay
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Francis Peay vs Homer Rice
Francis Peay: 21st pct vs Homer Rice: 19th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Homer Rice
Homer Rice: 93rd pct vs Francis Peay: 88th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Francis Peay vs Homer Rice
Francis Peay: 0 titles vs Homer Rice: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Homer Rice
Homer Rice: 11 seasons vs Francis Peay: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Homer Rice
Homer Rice: 30.5% vs Francis Peay: 21.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Francis Peay has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeFrancis Peay has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Homer Rice
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -20.3
7th pct
Lower end
Francis Peay
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -15.5
14th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Homer RiceFrancis Peay
EliteStrongAverageLean
Homer Rice: 1976 Rice
1967Actual season year • SRS range -18.2 to -6.81991
Active comparison point
Homer Rice • 1968
1968 Cincinnati
Best seasonBiggest improvement5-4-1 • SRS -8.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
55.0%
YoY SRS
+0.9
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Francis Peay
Nearest year 1986 • Northwestern
4-7 • SRS -6.8 • SP Overall -11.5
Homer Rice trails by a 1.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homer Rice | |||||
| Cincinnati | 1967-1968 | 2 | 8-10-1 | -8.6Best quality | -8.1 |
| Rice | 1976-1977 | 2 | 4-18 | -12.9 | -10.3 |
| Francis Peay | |||||
| Northwestern | 1986-1991 | 6 | 13-51-2 | -10.9 | -6.8Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Longer run
Full profile →Homer Rice
12-28-1 • 30.5% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
11 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Cincinnati 1968
SRS -8.1
Worst Season
Rice 1977
SRS -15.5
Biggest Improvement
Cincinnati 1968
0.9 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Francis Peay
13-51-2 • 21.2% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Northwestern 1986
SRS -6.8
Worst Season
Northwestern 1989
SRS -18.2
Biggest Improvement
Northwestern 1990
8.3 SRS