Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: David Bailiff vs Chris Creighton
David Bailiff: 24th pct vs Chris Creighton: 23rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
David BailiffChris Creighton
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: David Bailiff
David Bailiff: 39th pct vs Chris Creighton: 27th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Chris Creighton
Chris Creighton: 40th pct vs David Bailiff: 26th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chris Creighton vs David Bailiff
Chris Creighton: 0 titles vs David Bailiff: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chris Creighton vs David Bailiff
Chris Creighton: 12 seasons vs David Bailiff: 11 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Chris Creighton
Chris Creighton: 43.2% vs David Bailiff: 41.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Chris Creighton and David Bailiff look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarChris Creighton and David Bailiff look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
David Bailiff
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -11.9
22th pct
Lower end
Chris Creighton
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -11.3
24th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
David BailiffChris Creighton
EliteStrongAverageLean
2007Actual season year • SRS range -27.1 to 1.62025
Active comparison point
David Bailiff • 2008
2008 Rice
Best seasonBiggest improvement10-3 • SRS 1.6 • SP Overall 4.8
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+19.0
SP Off / Def
40.5 / 35.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chris Creighton
Nearest year 2014 • Eastern Michigan
2-10 • SRS -27.1 • SP Overall -25.9
David Bailiff holds a 28.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +22.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Bailiff | |||||
| Rice | 2007-2017 | 11 | 57-80 | -12.6 | 1.6Highest peak |
| Chris Creighton | |||||
| Eastern Michigan | 2014-2025 | 12 | 57-75 | -12.2 | -3.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →David Bailiff
57-80 • 41.6% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
1.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Rice 2008
SRS 1.6
Worst Season
Rice 2017
SRS -24.4
Biggest Improvement
Rice 2008
19.0 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Chris Creighton
57-75 • 43.2% • 12 seasons • 0 titles
40th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Eastern Michigan 2018
SRS -3.4
Worst Season
Eastern Michigan 2014
SRS -27.1
Biggest Improvement
Eastern Michigan 2016
13.8 SRS