Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Dave Doeren vs Morley Jennings
Dave Doeren: 62nd pct vs Morley Jennings: 61st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Morley JenningsDave Doeren
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Morley Jennings vs Dave Doeren
Morley Jennings: 71st pct vs Dave Doeren: 70th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Morley Jennings
Morley Jennings: 56th pct vs Dave Doeren: 49th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dave Doeren vs Morley Jennings
Dave Doeren: 0 titles vs Morley Jennings: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dave Doeren vs Morley Jennings
Dave Doeren: 15 seasons vs Morley Jennings: 15 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Dave Doeren
Dave Doeren: 61.5% vs Morley Jennings: 57.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dave Doeren sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDave Doeren sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Morley Jennings
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Dave Doeren
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 6.9
77th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Morley JenningsDave Doeren
EliteStrongAverageLean
Dave Doeren: 2013 NC State
1926Actual season year • SRS range -12.0 to 14.02025
Active comparison point
Morley Jennings • 1937
1937 Baylor
Best season7-3 • SRS 14.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
70.0%
YoY SRS
+7.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dave Doeren
Nearest year 2011 • Northern Illinois
11-3 • SRS 2.6 • SP Overall 2.2
Morley Jennings holds a 11.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morley Jennings | |||||
| Baylor | 1926-1940 | 15 | 83-60-6 | 4.7 | 14.0Longest stop |
| Dave Doeren | |||||
| Northern Illinois | 2011-2012 | 2 | 23-4 | 3.9 | 5.1 |
| NC State | 2013-2025 | 13 | 87-65 | 4.2 | 13.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Morley Jennings
83-60-6 • 57.7% • 15 seasons • 0 titles
56th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Baylor 1937
SRS 14.0
Worst Season
Baylor 1931
SRS -9.2
Biggest Improvement
Baylor 1935
13.0 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Dave Doeren
110-69 • 61.5% • 15 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
NC State 2017
SRS 13.7
Worst Season
NC State 2019
SRS -12.0
Biggest Improvement
NC State 2025
9.1 SRS