Vanderbilt
1904-1934 • 197-55-19
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
1904-1934 • Vanderbilt
One defining stop at Vanderbilt.
Dan McGugin coached 30 seasons, won 76.2%, and posted an average SRS of 8.9. Best season: 1905 Vanderbilt. The profile was balanced with a swing-heavy profile. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
197-55-19
Career Win %
76.2%
Seasons
30
Career Span
31 years
Average SRS
8.9
Peak SRS
25.4
Best Finish
—
Consistency
43.1
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
7-1 • SRS 25.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
87.5%
YoY SRS
+12.7
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Vanderbilt
1904-1934 • 30 seasons
Avg SRS 8.9 • Win % 76.2%
Longest Tenure
Vanderbilt • 30 seasons
Best Tenure
Vanderbilt • 8.9 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Vanderbilt • 76.2%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dan McGugin
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1904-1934 • 197-55-19
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
High Points
Best Season
Vanderbilt 1905
7-1 • SRS 25.4
Biggest Improvement
Vanderbilt 1915
9-1 • 15.7 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Vanderbilt 1917
5-3 • SRS -3.5
Biggest Drop
Vanderbilt 1908
7-2-1 • -12.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Vanderbilt | 1934 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | 3.9 | — | — | — | +3.2 | +11.7% |
| Vanderbilt | 1933 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 55.0% | — | — | 0.7 | — | — | — | -9.3 | -22.8% |
| Vanderbilt | 1932 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 77.8% | — | — | 10.0 | — | — | — | -4.8 | +22.2% |
| Vanderbilt | 1931 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% | — | — | 14.8 | — | — | — | +0.3 | -24.4% |
| Vanderbilt | 1930 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 14.5 | — | — | — | +5.2 | +2.2% |
| Vanderbilt | 1929 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% | — | — | 9.3 | — | — | — | +1.7 | -2.2% |
| Vanderbilt | 1928 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 7.6 | — | — | — | -5.7 | -1.8% |
| Vanderbilt | 1927 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 81.8% | — | — | 13.3 | — | — | — | +1.6 | -7.1% |
| Vanderbilt | 1926 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 11.7 | — | — | — | +10.2 | +22.2% |
| Vanderbilt | 1925 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | 1.5 | — | — | — | -5.6 | +1.7% |
| Vanderbilt | 1924 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 65.0% | — | — | 7.1 | — | — | — | -1.4 | -3.8% |
| Vanderbilt | 1923 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 68.8% | — | — | 8.5 | — | — | — | -6.8 | -25.7% |
| Vanderbilt | 1922 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 94.4% | — | — | 15.3 | — | — | — | +4.6 | +0.7% |
| Vanderbilt | 1921 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 93.8% | — | — | 10.7 | — | — | — | +8.0 | +32.6% |
| Vanderbilt | 1920 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 61.1% | — | — | 2.7 | — | — | — | +3.8 | -13.9% |
| Vanderbilt | 1919 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% | — | — | -1.1 | — | — | — | +2.4 | +12.5% |
| Vanderbilt | 1917 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% | — | — | -3.5 | — | — | — | -6.4 | -20.8% |
| Vanderbilt | 1916 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% | — | — | 2.9 | — | — | — | -10.8 | -6.7% |
| Vanderbilt | 1915 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% | — | — | 13.7 | — | — | — | +15.7 | +65.0% |
| Vanderbilt | 1914 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% | — | — | -2.0 | — | — | — | -6.0 | -37.5% |
| Vanderbilt | 1913 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% | — | — | 4.0 | — | — | — | -8.6 | -22.5% |
| Vanderbilt | 1912 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 85.0% | — | — | 12.6 | — | — | — | -6.3 | -3.9% |
| Vanderbilt | 1911 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 18.9 | — | — | — | +0.6 | -5.6% |
| Vanderbilt | 1910 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 94.4% | — | — | 18.3 | — | — | — | +11.5 | +24.4% |
| Vanderbilt | 1909 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 6.8 | — | — | — | +9.3 | -5.0% |
| Vanderbilt | 1908 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% | — | — | -2.5 | — | — | — | -12.8 | -3.6% |
| Vanderbilt | 1907 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 78.6% | — | — | 10.3 | — | — | — | -9.0 | -10.3% |
| Vanderbilt | 1906 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 19.3 | — | — | — | -6.1 | +1.4% |
| Vanderbilt | 1905 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% | — | — | 25.4 | — | — | — | +12.7 | -12.5% |
| Vanderbilt | 1904 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 12.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 9.1 • Peak SRS 28.8 • 31 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 24.2 • 29 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 8.8 • Peak SRS 22.4 • 10 seasons
Best finish #6 • Volatility 10.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.3
Avg SRS 11.0 • Peak SRS 24.5 • 29 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 8.5 • Peak SRS 26.0 • 23 seasons
Best finish #3 • Volatility 8.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.6
Avg SRS 7.3 • Peak SRS 21.2 • 27 seasons
Best finish #5 • Volatility 8.0
Open profile →