1905-1913 • Kansas, Pittsburgh
2 schools coached, anchored by Kansas.
Arthur Mosse coached 3 seasons, won 67.9%, and posted an average SRS of -2.5. Best season: 1912 Kansas. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 2 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
19-9
Career Win %
67.9%
Seasons
3
Career Span
9 years
Average SRS
-2.5
Peak SRS
10.2
Best Finish
—
Consistency
18.2
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
4-4 • SRS 10.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+21.9
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Kansas
1912-1913 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 2.1 • Win % 56.3%
Pittsburgh
1905-1905 • 1 seasons
Avg SRS -11.7 • Win % 83.3%
Longest Tenure
Kansas • 2 seasons
Best Tenure
Kansas • 2.1 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Pittsburgh • 83.3%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Arthur Mosse
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1912-1913 • 9-7
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.5 during vs 6.4 baseline
-1.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
2.1 during vs -0.3 baseline
+2.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1905-1905 • 10-2
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
High Points
Best Season
Kansas 1912
4-4 • SRS 10.2
Biggest Improvement
Kansas 1912
4-4 • 21.9 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Pittsburgh 1905
10-2 • SRS -11.7
Biggest Drop
Kansas 1913
5-3 • -16.1 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Kansas | 1913 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% | — | — | -5.9 | — | — | — | -16.1 | +12.5% |
| Kansas | 1912 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | 10.2 | — | — | — | +21.9 | -33.3% |
| Pittsburgh | 1905 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | — | — | -11.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS -2.5 • Peak SRS 9.1 • 10 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS -2.9 • Peak SRS 9.9 • 7 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.4
Avg SRS -3.9 • Peak SRS 18.3 • 9 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.1
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.6
Avg SRS -3.1 • Peak SRS 8.9 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.5
Avg SRS -1.0 • Peak SRS 10.0 • 9 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -2.8 • Peak SRS 9.2 • 9 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →