Tulsa
1917-1917 • 0-8-1
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS -24.8Win % 5.6%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
← Back to Coaches
Coach ProfileBalanced
Hal Medford
1917-1917 • Tulsa
One defining stop at Tulsa.
Hal Medford coached 1 seasons, won 5.6%, and posted an average SRS of -24.8. Best season: 1917 Tulsa. The profile was balanced with limited volatility context. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
0-8-1
Career Win %
5.6%
Seasons
1
Career Span
1 years
Average SRS
-24.8
Peak SRS
-24.8
Best Finish
—
Consistency
—
Higher = steadier
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Hal Medford
EliteStrongAverageLean
1916Actual season year • SRS range -25.8 to -23.81918
Active comparison point
Hal Medford • 1917
1917 Tulsa
Best seasonWorst season0-8-1 • SRS -24.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
5.6%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
School Tenures
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure
Tulsa
1917-1917 • 1 seasons
Avg SRS -24.8 • Win % 5.6%
Longest Tenure
Tulsa • 1 seasons
Best Tenure
Tulsa • -24.8 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Tulsa • 5.6%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Hal Medford
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Impact by School
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
Career Highs and Lows
High Points
Best Season
Tulsa 1917
0-8-1 • SRS -24.8
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Tulsa 1917
0-8-1 • SRS -24.8
Biggest Drop
Unavailable
Season-by-Season Results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Tulsa | 1917 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 5.6% | — | — | -24.8 | — | — | — | — | — |
Similar Coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Okie Blanchard
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS -24.7 • Peak SRS -24.7 • 1 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 0.0
Open profile →Stanley Cofall
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -24.5 • Peak SRS -24.5 • 1 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 0.0
Open profile →NA Marriam
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS -25.2 • Peak SRS -25.2 • 1 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 0.0
Open profile →Alexander Jerrems
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -24.5 • Peak SRS -24.5 • 2 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 0.0
Open profile →Reed Stringer
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS -23.9 • Peak SRS -23.9 • 1 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 0.0
Open profile →William Martin
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS -23.7 • Peak SRS -23.7 • 1 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 0.0
Open profile →