2001-2025 • Rutgers
One defining stop at Rutgers.
Greg Schiano coached 17 seasons, won 48.2%, and posted an average SRS of -0.4. Best season: 2006 Rutgers. The profile was defense-first with a highly volatile profile. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
94-101
Career Win %
48.2%
Seasons
17
Career Span
25 years
Average SRS
-0.4
Peak SRS
15.5
Best Finish
#12
Consistency
26.1
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-2 • SRS 15.5 • SP Overall 14.8
Win %
84.6%
YoY SRS
+13.9
SP Off / Def
27.9 / 14.1
Finish
#12
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Rutgers
2001-2025 • 17 seasons
Avg SRS -0.4 • Win % 48.2%
Longest Tenure
Rutgers • 17 seasons
Best Tenure
Rutgers • -0.4 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Rutgers • 48.2%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Greg Schiano sets the reference point in overall strength.
Greg Schiano sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Greg Schiano
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -1.7
51th pct
Mixed
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2001-2025 • 94-101
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.5 during vs 2.2 baseline
+3.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-0.4 during vs -16.2 baseline
+15.8
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-1.7 during vs -17.1 baseline
+15.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
5.9% during vs 0.0% baseline
+5.9%
High Points
Best Season
Rutgers 2006
11-2 • SRS 15.5
Biggest Improvement
Rutgers 2003
5-7 • 15.3 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Rutgers 2007
8-5 • SP Off 37.0
Best Defensive Season
Rutgers 2006
11-2 • SP Def 14.1
Setbacks
Worst Season
Rutgers 2001
2-9 • SRS -17.4
Biggest Drop
Rutgers 2010
4-8 • -15.2 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Rutgers | 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 2.4 | 1.0 | 31.6 | 30.7 | -2.7 | — |
| Rutgers | 2024 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 5.1 | 6.4 | 28.5 | 22.8 | +2.0 | 0.0% |
| Rutgers | 2023 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 3.1 | 3.5 | 21.0 | 18.7 | +10.4 | +20.5% |
| Rutgers | 2022 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -7.3 | -9.1 | 16.4 | 25.2 | -7.7 | -5.1% |
| Rutgers | 2021 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 38.5% | — | — | 0.4 | -3.0 | 20.8 | 23.7 | +3.1 | +5.1% |
| Rutgers | 2020 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -2.7 | -10.5 | 20.8 | 31.5 | -8.1 | -35.9% |
| Rutgers | 2011 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 5.4 | 0.8 | 20.5 | 19.3 | +15.1 | +35.9% |
| Rutgers | 2010 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -9.7 | -11.7 | 17.0 | 27.7 | -15.2 | -35.9% |
| Rutgers | 2009 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 5.5 | 3.1 | 22.1 | 19.0 | -1.4 | +7.7% |
| Rutgers | 2008 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | 6.9 | 2.4 | 28.8 | 25.2 | -1.5 | 0.0% |
| Rutgers | 2007 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #16 | — | 8.4 | 14.3 | 37.0 | 22.2 | -7.1 | -23.1% |
| Rutgers | 2006 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | — | #12 | 15.5 | 14.8 | 27.9 | 14.1 | +13.9 | +26.3% |
| Rutgers | 2005 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 1.6 | 4.0 | 29.5 | 25.5 | +8.4 | +22.0% |
| Rutgers | 2004 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | -6.8 | -6.7 | 30.9 | 36.3 | -5.8 | -5.3% |
| Rutgers | 2003 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -1.0 | 0.0 | 34.7 | 34.8 | +15.3 | +33.3% |
| Rutgers | 2002 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8.3% | — | — | -16.3 | -16.9 | 20.0 | 35.3 | +1.1 | -9.8% |
| Rutgers | 2001 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18.2% | — | — | -17.4 | -20.8 | 18.7 | 37.1 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.7
Avg SRS -2.1 • Peak SRS 6.8 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.2
Avg SRS 2.2 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 27 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 8.7
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.7
Avg SRS 1.8 • Peak SRS 17.0 • 22 seasons
Best finish #6 • Volatility 7.8
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.5
Avg SRS -1.9 • Peak SRS 15.8 • 17 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 9.6
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 1.0
Avg SRS 3.1 • Peak SRS 18.5 • 26 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →avg SRS within 0.4 • volatility within 0.9
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 20.5 • 25 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →