1995-2016 • Auburn, Cincinnati, Ole Miss, Texas Tech
4 schools coached, anchored by Auburn.
Tommy Tuberville coached 21 seasons, won 61.6%, and posted an average SRS of 5.0. Best season: 2004 Auburn. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 4 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
159-99
Career Win %
61.6%
Seasons
21
Career Span
22 years
Average SRS
5.0
Peak SRS
22.7
Best Finish
#2
Consistency
27.8
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
13-0 • SRS 22.7 • SP Overall 27.3
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+11.9
SP Off / Def
39.3 / 12.5
Finish
#2
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Cincinnati
2013-2016 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -2.4 • Win % 56.9%
Texas Tech
2010-2012 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS 2.8 • Win % 54.0%
Auburn
1999-2008 • 10 seasons
Avg SRS 10.9 • Win % 68.0%
Ole Miss
1995-1998 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -0.5 • Win % 55.6%
Longest Tenure
Auburn • 10 seasons
Best Tenure
Auburn • 10.9 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Auburn • 68.0%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tommy Tuberville sets the reference point in overall strength.
Tommy Tuberville sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tommy Tuberville
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 9.8
84th pct
Strong
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2013-2016 • 29-22
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.3 during vs 9.2 baseline
-1.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-2.4 during vs 6.9 baseline
-9.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
4.1 during vs 10.6 baseline
-6.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 60.0% baseline
-60.0%
2010-2012 • 20-17
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.7 during vs 9.0 baseline
-2.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
2.8 during vs 13.2 baseline
-10.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
9.7 during vs 23.2 baseline
-13.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-80.0%
1999-2008 • 85-40
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.5 during vs 7.2 baseline
+1.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
10.9 during vs 11.0 baseline
-0.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
15.8 during vs 15.3 baseline
+0.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
60.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-20.0%
1995-1998 • 25-20
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.3 during vs 6.4 baseline
-0.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-0.5 during vs 3.9 baseline
-4.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
0.8 during vs 5.5 baseline
-4.7
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
25.0% during vs 40.0% baseline
-15.0%
High Points
Best Season
Auburn 2004
13-0 • SRS 22.7
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1997
8-4 • 21.6 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas Tech 2012
7-5 • SP Off 44.1
Best Defensive Season
Auburn 2007
9-4 • SP Def 11.3
Setbacks
Worst Season
Cincinnati 2016
4-8 • SRS -11.7
Biggest Drop
Auburn 2008
5-7 • -11.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Cincinnati | 2016 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -11.7 | -3.6 | 24.5 | 27.3 | -11.8 | -20.5% |
| Cincinnati | 2015 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 0.1 | 5.3 | 34.4 | 28.2 | -1.5 | -15.4% |
| Cincinnati | 2014 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 1.6 | 6.9 | 36.3 | 29.8 | +1.0 | 0.0% |
| Cincinnati | 2013 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 0.6 | 7.8 | 31.9 | 21.6 | -7.3 | +10.9% |
| Texas Tech | 2012 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 7.9 | 17.0 | 44.1 | 26.5 | +8.3 | +16.7% |
| Texas Tech | 2011 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -0.4 | 4.8 | 38.6 | 34.5 | -1.3 | -19.9% |
| Texas Tech | 2010 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | 0.9 | 7.4 | 34.2 | 26.9 | -0.4 | +19.9% |
| Auburn | 2008 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | #10 | — | 1.3 | 1.4 | 19.7 | 17.4 | -11.9 | -27.6% |
| Auburn | 2007 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | #18 | #15 | 13.2 | 20.7 | 31.3 | 11.3 | -0.3 | -15.4% |
| Auburn | 2006 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #4 | #9 | 13.5 | 19.4 | 32.4 | 15.1 | -2.3 | +9.6% |
| Auburn | 2005 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #16 | #14 | 15.8 | 20.7 | 35.4 | 14.7 | -6.9 | -25.0% |
| Auburn | 2004 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | #17 | #2 | 22.7 | 27.3 | 39.3 | 12.5 | +11.9 | +38.5% |
| Auburn | 2003 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #6 | — | 10.8 | 17.9 | 33.2 | 17.0 | -3.7 | -7.7% |
| Auburn | 2002 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #14 | 14.5 | 19.2 | 36.8 | 19.5 | +10.0 | +10.9% |
| Auburn | 2001 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 4.5 | 8.5 | 30.5 | 23.4 | -2.1 | -10.9% |
| Auburn | 2000 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #18 | 6.6 | 12.8 | 32.9 | 21.0 | +0.8 | +23.8% |
| Auburn | 1999 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | 5.8 | 9.8 | 30.3 | 21.8 | +6.0 | -9.1% |
| Ole Miss | 1998 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | -0.2 | -1.4 | 27.6 | 29.0 | -10.8 | -12.1% |
| Ole Miss | 1997 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | #22 | 10.6 | 17.0 | 33.0 | 17.5 | +21.6 | +21.2% |
| Ole Miss | 1996 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -11.0 | -10.3 | 21.1 | 30.7 | -9.8 | -9.1% |
| Ole Miss | 1995 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | -1.2 | -2.0 | 19.8 | 21.8 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 4.7 • Peak SRS 21.1 • 21 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 8.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS 6.2 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 22 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 8.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 5.8 • Peak SRS 26.7 • 20 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 5.2 • Peak SRS 19.6 • 18 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 4.6 • Peak SRS 19.5 • 19 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 6.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 5.0 • Peak SRS 18.8 • 19 seasons
Best finish #3 • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →