1991-1996 • SMU
One defining stop at SMU.
Tom Rossley coached 6 seasons, won 25.0%, and posted an average SRS of -10.0. Best season: 1996 SMU. The profile was balanced with a very steady week-to-week shape. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
15-48-3
Career Win %
25.0%
Seasons
6
Career Span
6 years
Average SRS
-10.0
Peak SRS
-2.8
Best Finish
—
Consistency
76.5
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
5-6 • SRS -2.8 • SP Overall -0.4
Win %
45.5%
YoY SRS
+13.8
SP Off / Def
28.5 / 29.0
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
SMU
1991-1996 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS -10.0 • Win % 25.0%
Longest Tenure
SMU • 6 seasons
Best Tenure
SMU • -10.0 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
SMU • 25.0%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tom Rossley sets the reference point in overall strength.
Tom Rossley sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tom Rossley
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.3
22th pct
Lower end
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1991-1996 • 15-48-3
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (3 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
2.5 during vs 3.0 baseline
-0.5
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-10.0 during vs -11.5 baseline
+1.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-12.3 during vs -12.4 baseline
+0.1
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
SMU 1996
5-6 • SRS -2.8
Biggest Improvement
SMU 1996
5-6 • 13.8 SRS
Best Offensive Season
SMU 1996
5-6 • SP Off 28.5
Best Defensive Season
SMU 1996
5-6 • SP Def 29.0
Setbacks
Worst Season
SMU 1995
1-10 • SRS -16.6
Biggest Drop
SMU 1995
1-10 • -5.5 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| SMU | 1996 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -2.8 | -0.4 | 28.5 | 29.0 | +13.8 | +36.4% |
| SMU | 1995 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 9.1% | — | — | -16.6 | -18.7 | 17.8 | 34.9 | -5.5 | -4.5% |
| SMU | 1994 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 13.6% | — | — | -11.1 | -14.6 | 23.8 | 35.6 | -5.1 | -13.6% |
| SMU | 1993 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 27.3% | — | — | -6.0 | -12.1 | 21.3 | 32.3 | +2.7 | -18.2% |
| SMU | 1992 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -8.7 | -10.2 | 22.7 | 32.0 | +6.2 | +36.4% |
| SMU | 1991 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 9.1% | — | — | -14.9 | -17.5 | 19.1 | 35.3 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS -11.1 • Peak SRS -4.9 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.2
Avg SRS -11.2 • Peak SRS -4.3 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 4.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -9.7 • Peak SRS -3.4 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 4.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS -9.1 • Peak SRS -3.0 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.6
Avg SRS -8.4 • Peak SRS 0.0 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS -10.8 • Peak SRS -6.1 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 4.1
Open profile →