UTSA
2012-2015 • 22-26
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
2001-2015 • Miami, UTSA
2 schools coached, anchored by Miami.
Larry Coker coached 10 seasons, won 66.7%, and posted an average SRS of 6.1. Best season: 2001 Miami. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 2 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
82-41
Career Win %
66.7%
Seasons
10
Career Span
15 years
Average SRS
6.1
Peak SRS
32.4
Best Finish
#1
Consistency
0.6
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
12-0 • SRS 32.4 • SP Overall 35.5
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
47.0 / 13.5
Finish
#1
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
UTSA
2012-2015 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -13.2 • Win % 45.8%
Miami
2001-2006 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS 19.0 • Win % 80.0%
Longest Tenure
Miami • 6 seasons
Best Tenure
Miami • 19.0 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Miami • 80.0%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Larry Coker sets the reference point in overall strength.
Larry Coker sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Larry Coker
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 10.6
86th pct
Elite
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2012-2015 • 22-26
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
2001-2006 • 60-15
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
10.0 during vs 8.6 baseline
+1.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
19.0 during vs 14.9 baseline
+4.1
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
25.6 during vs 18.7 baseline
+6.9
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
83.3% during vs 80.0% baseline
+3.3%
High Points
Best Season
Miami 2001
12-0 • SRS 32.4
Biggest Improvement
UTSA 2013
7-5 • 9.0 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Miami 2001
12-0 • SP Off 47.0
Best Defensive Season
Miami 2005
9-3 • SP Def 7.0
Setbacks
Worst Season
UTSA 2015
3-9 • SRS -18.9
Biggest Drop
UTSA 2012
8-4 • -17.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| UTSA | 2015 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% | — | — | -18.9 | -17.7 | 19.3 | 36.6 | -6.1 | -8.3% |
| UTSA | 2014 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -12.8 | -3.4 | 16.6 | 22.1 | -6.8 | -25.0% |
| UTSA | 2013 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | -6.0 | -6.6 | 25.9 | 30.3 | +9.0 | -8.3% |
| UTSA | 2012 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | -15.0 | -20.1 | 23.5 | 42.4 | -17.8 | +12.8% |
| Miami | 2006 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #12 | — | 2.8 | 13.9 | 23.6 | 9.3 | -13.1 | -21.1% |
| Miami | 2005 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #9 | #17 | 15.9 | 26.0 | 33.0 | 7.0 | -6.0 | 0.0% |
| Miami | 2004 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #6 | #11 | 21.9 | 26.8 | 41.3 | 16.5 | +5.3 | -9.6% |
| Miami | 2003 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #3 | #5 | 16.6 | 22.9 | 36.2 | 14.4 | -7.8 | -7.7% |
| Miami | 2002 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | #1 | #2 | 24.4 | 28.7 | 46.8 | 21.3 | -8.0 | -7.7% |
| Miami | 2001 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | #2 | #1 | 32.4 | 35.5 | 47.0 | 13.5 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 6.3 • Peak SRS 37.5 • 11 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 16.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 6.4 • Peak SRS 28.1 • 16 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 13.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.9
Avg SRS 0.3 • Peak SRS 22.9 • 13 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 16.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • similar peak range
Avg SRS 9.6 • Peak SRS 32.5 • 11 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 15.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 6.3 • Peak SRS 29.8 • 22 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 14.1
Open profile →avg SRS within 1.9 • volatility within 0.4
Avg SRS 8.0 • Peak SRS 20.8 • 5 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility 17.9
Open profile →