1915-1946 • Chicago, Maryland, Pittsburgh, Stanford, Tulane
5 schools coached, anchored by Tulane.
Clark Shaughnessy coached 24 seasons, won 54.6%, and posted an average SRS of -2.8. Best season: 1940 Stanford. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 5 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
108-89-10
Career Win %
54.6%
Seasons
24
Career Span
32 years
Average SRS
-2.8
Peak SRS
19.5
Best Finish
#2
Consistency
11.9
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-0 • SRS 19.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+44.6
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#2
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Maryland
1942-1946 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS -8.1 • Win % 55.6%
Pittsburgh
1943-1945 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS -2.8 • Win % 37.0%
Stanford
1940-1941 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 16.6 • Win % 84.2%
Chicago
1933-1939 • 7 seasons
Avg SRS -8.0 • Win % 34.5%
Tulane
1915-1926 • 10 seasons
Avg SRS -2.0 • Win % 65.9%
Longest Tenure
Tulane • 10 seasons
Best Tenure
Stanford • 16.6 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Stanford • 84.2%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Clark Shaughnessy
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1942-1946 • 10-8
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.0 during vs 3.4 baseline
+1.6
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-8.1 during vs -12.1 baseline
+4.0
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1943-1945 • 10-17
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
3.3 during vs 4.4 baseline
-1.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-2.8 during vs 6.2 baseline
-9.1
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 20.0% baseline
-20.0%
1940-1941 • 16-3
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.0 during vs 3.6 baseline
+4.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
16.6 during vs 6.5 baseline
+10.1
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
50.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+50.0%
1933-1939 • 17-34-4
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
2.4 during vs 3.2 baseline
-0.8
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-8.0 during vs -3.5 baseline
-4.6
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1915-1926 • 55-27-6
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.5 during vs 3.2 baseline
+2.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-2.0 during vs -19.7 baseline
+17.8
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Stanford 1940
10-0 • SRS 19.5
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 1940
10-0 • 44.6 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Chicago 1939
2-6 • SRS -25.1
Biggest Drop
Maryland 1942
7-2 • -22.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Maryland | 1946 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -6.8 | — | — | — | -8.0 | +3.3% |
| Pittsburgh | 1945 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% | — | — | 1.2 | — | — | — | +3.0 | -14.4% |
| Pittsburgh | 1944 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% | — | — | -1.8 | — | — | — | +6.1 | +6.9% |
| Pittsburgh | 1943 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% | — | — | -7.9 | — | — | — | +1.4 | -40.3% |
| Maryland | 1942 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% | — | — | -9.3 | — | — | — | -22.9 | +11.1% |
| Stanford | 1941 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | 13.6 | — | — | — | -5.9 | -33.3% |
| Stanford | 1940 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | #2 | 19.5 | — | — | — | +44.6 | +75.0% |
| Chicago | 1939 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% | — | — | -25.1 | — | — | — | -4.9 | +6.3% |
| Chicago | 1938 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 18.8% | — | — | -20.2 | — | — | — | -9.4 | +4.5% |
| Chicago | 1937 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 14.3% | — | — | -10.8 | — | — | — | +1.1 | -17.0% |
| Chicago | 1936 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 31.3% | — | — | -11.9 | — | — | — | -9.7 | -18.8% |
| Chicago | 1935 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -2.2 | — | — | — | -7.9 | 0.0% |
| Chicago | 1934 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | 5.7 | — | — | — | -2.6 | 0.0% |
| Chicago | 1933 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | 8.3 | — | — | — | +9.2 | +11.1% |
| Tulane | 1926 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 38.9% | — | — | -0.9 | — | — | — | -13.8 | -56.1% |
| Tulane | 1925 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 95.0% | — | — | 12.9 | — | — | — | +7.2 | +6.1% |
| Tulane | 1924 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 5.7 | — | — | — | +12.4 | +23.9% |
| Tulane | 1923 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 65.0% | — | — | -6.7 | — | — | — | -0.3 | +15.0% |
| Tulane | 1922 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -6.4 | — | — | — | -7.5 | -22.2% |
| Tulane | 1920 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 72.2% | — | — | 1.1 | — | — | — | +6.2 | 0.0% |
| Tulane | 1919 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 72.2% | — | — | -5.1 | — | — | — | -6.8 | +9.7% |
| Tulane | 1917 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% | — | — | 1.7 | — | — | — | +9.0 | +6.3% |
| Tulane | 1916 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 56.3% | — | — | -7.3 | — | — | — | +7.3 | +6.3% |
| Tulane | 1915 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -14.6 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS -2.4 • Peak SRS 20.0 • 30 seasons
Best finish #20 • Volatility 12.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.2
Avg SRS -4.0 • Peak SRS 13.6 • 24 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS -3.9 • Peak SRS 17.1 • 16 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 12.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.0
Avg SRS 0.0 • Peak SRS 19.4 • 27 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 10.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.7
Avg SRS 1.5 • Peak SRS 17.4 • 29 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 9.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS -3.5 • Peak SRS 8.0 • 17 seasons
Best finish #10 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →