← Back to Coaches
Consistent WinnerBalanced

Harry Nelly

1908-1910Army

One defining stop at Army.

Harry Nelly coached 3 seasons, won 72.7%, and posted an average SRS of 16.1. Best season: 1908 Army. The profile was balanced with a very steady week-to-week shape. One primary stop defined the run.

Career Record

15-5-2

Career Win %

72.7%

Seasons

3

Career Span

3 years

Average SRS

16.1

Peak SRS

18.1

Best Finish

Consistency

92.8

Higher = steadier

Career Arc

Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Harry Nelly
EliteStrongAverageLean
1908Actual season year • SRS range 12.0 to 18.11910

Active comparison point

Harry Nelly1908

Selected

1908 Army

Best season

6-1-2 • SRS 18.1 • SP Overall

Win %

77.8%

YoY SRS

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.

School Tenures

Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.

Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure

Army

1908-19103 seasons

Avg SRS 16.1 • Win % 72.7%

Longest Tenure

Army • 3 seasons

Best Tenure

Army • 16.1 SRS

Best Tenure Win %

Army • 72.7%

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Harry Nelly

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Impact by School

See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.

Army

1908-191015-5-2

Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS 16.1Win % 72.7%

Avg wins

Higher is better

5.0 during vs 4.9 baseline

+0.1

Avg SRS

Higher is better

16.1 during vs 13.1 baseline

+3.0

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

during vs baseline

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline

+0.0%

Career Highs and Lows

High Points

Best Season

Army 1908

6-1-2SRS 18.1

Biggest Improvement

Army 1910

6-26.1 SRS

Best Offensive Season

Unavailable

Best Defensive Season

Unavailable

Setbacks

Worst Season

Army 1909

3-2SRS 12.0

Biggest Drop

Army 1909

3-2-6.1 SRS

Season-by-Season Results

Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.

Army1910862075.0%18.1+6.1+15.0%
Army1909532060.0%12.0-6.1-17.8%
Army1908961277.8%18.1

Similar Coaches

Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.

Henry Smither

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7

Balanced

Avg SRS 16.8 • Peak SRS 19.22 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 2.5

Open profile →

Billy Kinard

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3

Balanced

Avg SRS 16.4 • Peak SRS 18.42 seasons

Best finish #15 • Volatility 2.0

Open profile →

Cecil Isbell

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5

Balanced

Avg SRS 15.6 • Peak SRS 20.53 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.6

Open profile →

HN Russell

same balanced identity • volatility within 0.6

Balanced

Avg SRS 13.3 • Peak SRS 17.43 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.5

Open profile →

Dan Lanning

same balanced identity • volatility within 0.6

Balanced

Avg SRS 18.9 • Peak SRS 22.34 seasons

Best finish #3 • Volatility 3.4

Open profile →

Pete Reynolds

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1

Balanced

Avg SRS 16.2 • Peak SRS 17.43 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 1.3

Open profile →