1958-1970 • Iowa, Utah
2 schools coached, anchored by Utah.
Ray Nagel coached 13 seasons, won 45.1%, and posted an average SRS of -0.0. Best season: 1964 Utah. The profile was defense-first with a swing-heavy profile. 2 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
58-71-3
Career Win %
45.1%
Seasons
13
Career Span
13 years
Average SRS
-0.0
Peak SRS
15.9
Best Finish
—
Consistency
39.2
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-2 • SRS 15.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
81.8%
YoY SRS
+17.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Iowa
1966-1970 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS -0.9 • Win % 34.0%
Utah
1958-1965 • 8 seasons
Avg SRS 0.5 • Win % 51.8%
Longest Tenure
Utah • 8 seasons
Best Tenure
Utah • 0.5 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Utah • 51.8%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Ray Nagel sets the reference point in overall strength.
Ray Nagel sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Ray Nagel
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -14.1
17th pct
Lower end
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1966-1970 • 16-32-2
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
3.2 during vs 3.2 baseline
+0.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-0.9 during vs 9.7 baseline
-10.6
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-14.1 during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1958-1965 • 42-39-1
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.3 during vs 5.8 baseline
-0.6
Avg SRS
Higher is better
0.5 during vs -2.5 baseline
+3.0
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Utah 1964
9-2 • SRS 15.9
Biggest Improvement
Utah 1964
9-2 • 17.1 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Iowa 1970
3-6-1 • SP Off 16.8
Best Defensive Season
Iowa 1970
3-6-1 • SP Def 29.8
Setbacks
Worst Season
Iowa 1966
2-8 • SRS -12.1
Biggest Drop
Utah 1965
3-7 • -18.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Iowa | 1970 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 35.0% | — | — | -0.9 | -14.1 | 16.8 | 29.8 | -4.0 | -15.0% |
| Iowa | 1969 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | 3.1 | — | — | — | -7.7 | 0.0% |
| Iowa | 1968 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | 10.8 | — | — | — | +16.1 | +35.0% |
| Iowa | 1967 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 15.0% | — | — | -5.3 | — | — | — | +6.8 | -5.0% |
| Iowa | 1966 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 20.0% | — | — | -12.1 | — | — | — | -9.1 | -10.0% |
| Utah | 1965 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% | — | — | -3.0 | — | — | — | -18.9 | -51.8% |
| Utah | 1964 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% | — | — | 15.9 | — | — | — | +17.1 | +41.8% |
| Utah | 1963 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% | — | — | -1.2 | — | — | — | +4.5 | -5.0% |
| Utah | 1962 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 45.0% | — | — | -5.7 | — | — | — | -9.9 | -15.0% |
| Utah | 1961 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% | — | — | 4.2 | — | — | — | +0.9 | -10.0% |
| Utah | 1960 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 3.3 | — | — | — | +3.8 | +20.0% |
| Utah | 1959 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -0.5 | — | — | — | +8.5 | +13.6% |
| Utah | 1958 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | -9.0 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS -1.0 • Peak SRS 9.1 • 11 seasons
Best finish #17 • Volatility 7.4
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 0.2 • Peak SRS 9.9 • 10 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 0.7 • Peak SRS 8.2 • 13 seasons
Best finish #16 • Volatility 6.2
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.4
Avg SRS 2.3 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 13 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS -1.3 • Peak SRS 10.7 • 15 seasons
Best finish #18 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 0.7 • Peak SRS 11.2 • 11 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.9
Open profile →