1989-2002 • Texas A&M
One defining stop at Texas A&M.
RC Slocum coached 14 seasons, won 72.1%, and posted an average SRS of 13.1. Best season: 1993 Texas A&M. The profile was balanced with a very steady week-to-week shape. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
123-47-2
Career Win %
72.1%
Seasons
14
Career Span
14 years
Average SRS
13.1
Peak SRS
21.4
Best Finish
#7
Consistency
76.8
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-2 • SRS 21.4 • SP Overall 24.0
Win %
83.3%
YoY SRS
+9.5
SP Off / Def
39.7 / 17.1
Finish
#9
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Texas A&M
1989-2002 • 14 seasons
Avg SRS 13.1 • Win % 72.1%
Longest Tenure
Texas A&M • 14 seasons
Best Tenure
Texas A&M • 13.1 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Texas A&M • 72.1%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
RC Slocum sets the reference point in overall strength.
RC Slocum sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
RC Slocum
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 16.8
95th pct
Elite
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1989-2002 • 123-47-2
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.8 during vs 8.4 baseline
+0.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
13.1 during vs 10.6 baseline
+2.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
16.8 during vs 13.3 baseline
+3.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
71.4% during vs 60.0% baseline
+11.4%
High Points
Best Season
Texas A&M 1993
10-2 • SRS 21.4
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 1993
10-2 • 9.5 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas A&M 1990
9-3-1 • SP Off 40.8
Best Defensive Season
Texas A&M 1998
11-3 • SP Def 11.3
Setbacks
Worst Season
Texas A&M 2001
8-4 • SRS 6.5
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 1999
8-4 • -10.2 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Texas A&M | 2002 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | #23 | — | 6.7 | 7.8 | 35.0 | 29.0 | +0.2 | -16.7% |
| Texas A&M | 2001 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | 6.5 | 10.8 | 26.6 | 16.9 | -6.3 | +8.3% |
| Texas A&M | 2000 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 12.8 | 18.3 | 38.0 | 21.3 | +4.4 | -8.3% |
| Texas A&M | 1999 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | #7 | #23 | 8.4 | 13.2 | 33.8 | 21.6 | -10.2 | -11.9% |
| Texas A&M | 1998 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | #14 | #11 | 18.6 | 24.0 | 34.9 | 11.3 | +9.3 | +9.3% |
| Texas A&M | 1997 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #20 | 9.3 | 11.8 | 36.2 | 26.6 | +1.2 | +19.2% |
| Texas A&M | 1996 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | #13 | — | 8.1 | 10.5 | 35.4 | 26.9 | -4.6 | -25.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1995 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #3 | #15 | 12.7 | 17.4 | 30.9 | 14.7 | -0.9 | -20.4% |
| Texas A&M | 1994 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 95.5% | #15 | #8 | 13.6 | 17.9 | 33.6 | 17.4 | -7.8 | +12.1% |
| Texas A&M | 1993 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | #4 | #9 | 21.4 | 24.0 | 39.7 | 17.1 | +9.5 | -9.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1992 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | #7 | #7 | 11.9 | 16.2 | 32.6 | 18.0 | -8.1 | +9.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1991 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | #21 | #12 | 20.0 | 24.7 | 39.6 | 16.0 | +4.0 | +10.3% |
| Texas A&M | 1990 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 73.1% | #13 | #15 | 16.0 | 19.5 | 40.8 | 24.5 | -0.9 | +6.4% |
| Texas A&M | 1989 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | #20 | 16.9 | 19.3 | 35.7 | 18.0 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS 13.0 • Peak SRS 18.0 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 4.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 12.3 • Peak SRS 21.0 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS 12.1 • Peak SRS 24.1 • 9 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 13.5 • Peak SRS 19.7 • 9 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 5.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.8
Avg SRS 14.8 • Peak SRS 31.3 • 14 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 5.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 11.2 • Peak SRS 19.4 • 13 seasons
Best finish #14 • Volatility 5.3
Open profile →