← Back to Coaches
Peak DominatorBalancedLong Career

Homer Norton

1930-1947Centenary (LA), Texas A&M

2 schools coached, anchored by Texas A&M.

Homer Norton coached 18 seasons, won 64.0%, and posted an average SRS of 8.9. Best season: 1939 Texas A&M. The profile was balanced with a swing-heavy profile. 2 stops shaped the career arc.

Career Record

111-59-15

Career Win %

64.0%

Seasons

18

Career Span

18 years

Average SRS

8.9

Peak SRS

21.8

Best Finish

#1

Consistency

42.6

Higher = steadier

Career Arc

Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Homer Norton
EliteStrongAverageLean
Homer Norton: 1934 Texas A&M
1930Actual season year • SRS range -7.7 to 21.81947

Active comparison point

Homer Norton1939

Selected

1939 Texas A&M

Best season

11-0 • SRS 21.8 • SP Overall

Win %

100.0%

YoY SRS

+17.2

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

#1

Comparison context

Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.

School Tenures

Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.

Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure

Texas A&M

1934-194714 seasons

Avg SRS 9.7 • Win % 60.1%

Centenary (LA)

1930-19334 seasons

Avg SRS 6.4 • Win % 78.0%

Longest Tenure

Texas A&M • 14 seasons

Best Tenure

Texas A&M • 9.7 SRS

Best Tenure Win %

Centenary (LA) • 78.0%

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Homer Norton

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Impact by School

See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.

Texas A&M

1934-194782-53-9

Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS 9.7Win % 60.1%

Avg wins

Higher is better

5.9 during vs 4.8 baseline

+1.1

Avg SRS

Higher is better

9.7 during vs 6.7 baseline

+3.0

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

during vs baseline

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

21.4% during vs 0.0% baseline

+21.4%

Centenary (LA)

1930-193329-6-6

Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.

Avg SRS 6.4Win % 78.0%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.

Career Highs and Lows

High Points

Best Season

Texas A&M 1939

11-0SRS 21.8

Biggest Improvement

Centenary (LA) 1932

8-0-119.6 SRS

Best Offensive Season

Unavailable

Best Defensive Season

Unavailable

Setbacks

Worst Season

Centenary (LA) 1931

5-5SRS -7.7

Biggest Drop

Texas A&M 1934

2-7-2-16.0 SRS

Season-by-Season Results

Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.

Texas A&M19471036135.0%6.9-0.5-5.0%
Texas A&M19461046040.0%7.4+1.7-20.0%
Texas A&M19451064060.0%5.7+1.2-3.6%
Texas A&M19441174063.6%4.5-1.3-11.4%
Texas A&M19431072175.0%5.8-6.0+30.0%
Texas A&M19421045145.0%11.8-6.9-36.8%
Texas A&M19411192081.8%#918.7-1.7-8.2%
Texas A&M19401091090.0%#620.4-1.4-10.0%
Texas A&M1939111100100.0%#121.8+17.2+50.0%
Texas A&M1938944150.0%4.6-6.7-16.7%
Texas A&M1937952266.7%11.3+0.1-4.2%
Texas A&M19361283170.8%11.2+3.7+40.8%
Texas A&M19351037030.0%7.5+10.0+2.7%
Texas A&M19341127227.3%-2.5-16.0-56.1%
Centenary (LA)19331280483.3%13.5+1.6-11.1%
Centenary (LA)1932980194.4%11.9+19.6+44.4%
Centenary (LA)19311055050.0%-7.7-15.6-35.0%
Centenary (LA)19301081185.0%7.9

Similar Coaches

Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.

George Hauser

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1

Balanced

Avg SRS 9.1 • Peak SRS 15.05 seasons

Best finish #19 • Volatility 6.7

Open profile →

Dutch Meyer

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3

Balanced

Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 23.619 seasons

Best finish #1 • Volatility 8.1

Open profile →

Bret Bielema

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2

Balanced

Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 23.117 seasons

Best finish #7 • Volatility 7.8

Open profile →

Slip Madigan

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4

Balanced

Avg SRS 9.3 • Peak SRS 24.212 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.4

Open profile →

Gus Dorais

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5

Balanced

Avg SRS 8.4 • Peak SRS 32.319 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.4

Open profile →

Harry Mehre

same balanced identity • volatility within 0.3

Balanced

Avg SRS 6.8 • Peak SRS 19.917 seasons

Best finish #17 • Volatility 6.9

Open profile →