Centre College Kentucky
1919-1923 • 42-6-1
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS 13.3Win % 86.7%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
← Back to Coaches
Longevity CoachBalancedElite Peak
Charley Moran
1909-1923 • Centre College Kentucky, Texas A&M
2 schools coached, anchored by Texas A&M.
Charley Moran coached 11 seasons, won 83.3%, and posted an average SRS of 9.5. Best season: 1919 Centre College Kentucky. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 2 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
80-14-5
Career Win %
83.3%
Seasons
11
Career Span
15 years
Average SRS
9.5
Peak SRS
25.0
Best Finish
—
Consistency
9.8
Higher = steadier
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Charley Moran
EliteStrongAverageLean
Charley Moran: 1919 Centre College Kentucky
1909Actual season year • SRS range -19.4 to 25.01923
Active comparison point
Charley Moran • 1919
1919 Centre College Kentucky
Best seasonNew stop: Centre College Kentucky9-0 • SRS 25.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+21.7
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
School Tenures
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure
Centre College Kentucky
1919-1923 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 13.3 • Win % 86.7%
Texas A&M
1909-1914 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS 6.3 • Win % 80.0%
Longest Tenure
Texas A&M • 6 seasons
Best Tenure
Centre College Kentucky • 13.3 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Centre College Kentucky • 86.7%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charley Moran
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Impact by School
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
Texas A&M
1909-1914 • 38-8-4
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS 6.3Win % 80.0%
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.3 during vs 5.2 baseline
+1.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
6.3 during vs -9.6 baseline
+16.0
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
Career Highs and Lows
High Points
Best Season
Centre College Kentucky 1919
9-0 • SRS 25.0
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 1914
6-1-1 • 22.7 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Texas A&M 1913
3-4-2 • SRS -19.4
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 1913
3-4-2 • -35.1 SRS
Season-by-Season Results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Centre College Kentucky | 1923 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% | — | — | 4.6 | — | — | — | -10.0 | +3.3% |
| Centre College Kentucky | 1922 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 14.6 | — | — | — | +2.5 | -10.9% |
| Centre College Kentucky | 1921 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% | — | — | 12.1 | — | — | — | +1.9 | +10.9% |
| Centre College Kentucky | 1920 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 10.2 | — | — | — | -14.8 | -20.0% |
| Centre College Kentucky | 1919 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 25.0 | — | — | — | +21.7 | +18.8% |
| Texas A&M | 1914 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 81.3% | — | — | 3.3 | — | — | — | +22.7 | +36.8% |
| Texas A&M | 1913 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 44.4% | — | — | -19.4 | — | — | — | -35.1 | -44.4% |
| Texas A&M | 1912 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 15.7 | — | — | — | +2.9 | +3.2% |
| Texas A&M | 1911 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% | — | — | 12.8 | — | — | — | +2.0 | -3.2% |
| Texas A&M | 1910 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 10.8 | — | — | — | -4.0 | -4.9% |
| Texas A&M | 1909 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 93.8% | — | — | 14.8 | — | — | — | — | — |
Similar Coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Bill McCartney
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 9.1 • Peak SRS 24.4 • 13 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 11.1
Open profile →Milt Bruhn
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 9.9 • Peak SRS 29.6 • 11 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 10.9
Open profile →Joe Kuharich
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 21.0 • 8 seasons
Best finish #14 • Volatility 8.7
Open profile →Jesse Hawley
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 8.8 • Peak SRS 31.2 • 12 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.4
Open profile →Jack Meagher
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 29.3 • 15 seasons
Best finish #6 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →Slip Madigan
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 9.3 • Peak SRS 24.2 • 12 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.4
Open profile →